Roughly nine million South Africans – less than 20% of the population – are covered by private medical aids, with the rest relying on the state.
This explains, in part, why the government is attempting to rectify its plan to launch universal healthcare through the National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme. While the goals of the NHI are noble, there is a danger that they disrupt one part of the healthcare system that is working.
Kevin Aron, principal officer of Medshield Medical Scheme, argues that sustainable progress, rather than sweeping political promises, should guide the sector.
“In an environment defined by economic pressure and policy uncertainty, the priority should not be disruption for its own sake, but stability, sustainability and measurable improvement,” he says.
South Africa’s healthcare system operates in a complex environment shaped by economic pressure, rising costs and policy uncertainty.
For millions of South Africans, access to reliable care is not an abstract debate but a daily reality. Medical schemes like Medshield play a critical role in this landscape, providing stability for those who can afford cover while the public sector carries the broader burden.
The reality on the ground
For those without medical cover, outcomes can be dire.
Aron notes that serious conditions such as trauma from motor accidents, dialysis, or cancer treatment often become “potluck” – depending on which public facility a patient reaches.
“If you’re not on medical aid and need care … sometimes it could be a death sentence,” he explains.
In contrast, medical aid members generally receive high-quality care, but affordability remains a major challenge.
Households face sustained financial pressure, with medical scheme contributions often ranking among the largest monthly expenses. Medical inflation consistently runs 3-4% above general CPI, driven by new and expensive – but effective – drugs, rising input costs and increased utilisation.
At the same time, lifestyle-related conditions such as hypertension and diabetes are increasing, adding further strain to medical schemes.
The role of medical schemes
Aron emphasises that medical schemes are not temporary structures awaiting replacement. They form a vital part of the current system and will remain so for the foreseeable future.
The NHI debate highlights important aspirations for universal access, but it stumbles on practical questions about funding, capacity, governance and execution.
Simply put, we are a long way from the ideals of universal healthcare.
In this context, Medshield focuses on discipline and long-term value. This includes rigorous cost management, engagement with providers, and efforts to address fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA).
Aron points out that FWA is a global issue, with estimates suggesting up to 20% of healthcare spending is lost in this way.
Medshield works with specialist analysts to tackle inappropriate claims, collusion between practitioners and patients, and unnecessary procedures, particularly in certain allied health fields.
A prevention-first approach
A defining element of Medshield’s strategy is its emphasis on preventative care. Rather than waiting for conditions to escalate into high-cost hospital events, the scheme invests in early identification and support.
This includes wellness screenings, vaccinations, optical checks for conditions such as glaucoma, and proactive outreach to encourage members to complete recommended checks, such as mammograms.
“Prevention-focused healthcare is not simply a clinical ideal. It is an economic imperative in a high-cost environment,” Aron says. Technology and data-driven insights are playing an increasingly important role, enabling earlier risk detection and better member engagement.
Affordability and sustainability challenges
Affordability remains the central tension. Many South Africans who should ideally be on medical aid cannot afford it, placing additional pressure on the public sector.
Aron notes that lower-income options, intended for younger and healthier members, are increasingly used by older individuals with higher claims, which undermines their viability due to regulatory restrictions on risk rating.
Medical schemes must also maintain solvency levels (at least 25%) while managing cross-subsidisation between younger and older members.
Aron suggests that regulatory changes allowing more insurance-like products could offer greater flexibility, but current rules limit options, with medical schemes required to provide unlimited hospital cover for prescribed minimum benefits.
Looking toward collaboration
Aron believes the future lies in practical public-private collaboration rather than ideological division.
He envisions stronger contracting models where private expertise and capacity support the public system, potentially through commercial arrangements with well-managed state facilities.
“I would love where infrastructure in state hospitals is of high quality and well-staffed. In that situation, we would contract with them on a commercial basis, the same as we do with the private sector,” he says.
For Medshield, accountability means prudent financial management, transparent operations, and continuous improvement in service levels, such as faster claims and query resolution.
The scheme aims to deliver enduring value to members by balancing affordability, quality and sustainability.
In South Africa’s healthcare landscape, meaningful progress will come not from grand promises but from consistent, practical improvements that strengthen the system as it exists today while building toward a more inclusive future.
As Aron concludes, what matters most is not what is promised, but what is sustained.
Brought to you by Medshield.
Moneyweb does not endorse any product or service being advertised in sponsored articles on our platform.
#healthcare #sustainable #progress #matters #political #promises