{"id":7764,"date":"2026-06-17T15:56:40","date_gmt":"2026-06-17T15:56:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/?p=7764"},"modified":"2026-06-17T15:56:40","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T15:56:40","slug":"mizuho-sees-something-in-qbts-stock-the-market-is-missing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/?p=7764","title":{"rendered":"Mizuho sees something in QBTS stock the market is missing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p>2026 has not been the best year for shares in quantum computing darling D-Wave Quantum\u2019s (QBTS).<\/p>\n<p>The company kept posting engineering wins and a fast-growing order book, yet the stock kept sliding, with a <strong>year-to-date decline of 14.9%<\/strong> at the time of writing. <\/p>\n<p>That disconnect is what Wall Street started to reconsider this week.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Shares jumped sharply on Monday<\/strong> after a closely followed analyst left D-Wave\u2019s first investor day with a more confident read on the business.<\/p>\n<h2>Why Mizuho raised its D-Wave stock price target to $35<\/h2>\n<p>Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh lifted his D-Wave target to $35 from $29 and kept an Outperform rating, his way of saying he expects the stock to beat the broader market, Investing.com reported. <\/p>\n<p>The note landed Monday, and QBTS rallied about 13% to close near $26.71. With shares around $23 when the call went out, Rakesh\u2019s $35 target points to roughly 50% upside.<\/p>\n<p><strong>More Quantum Stocks:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>White House makes bold $2 billion bet on quantum stocks<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>IonQ stock spikes on massive quantum announcement<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Barclays sets eye-catching IBM stock price target<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The vote of confidence carries weight because of who made it. <strong>Rakesh ranks fourth<\/strong> out of more than 12,300 analysts tracked by TipRanks, with a 73% success rate.<\/p>\n<p>He pointed to D-Wave\u2019s lead in annealing and its road map toward fault-tolerant, gate-based machines.<\/p>\n<figure>\n<p>                        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thestreet.com\/.image\/NDA6MDAwMDAwMDAzMDgxMzg2\/d-wavelogo_pl_170626.jpg?profile=rss\" height=\"675\" width=\"1013\"><figcaption>Mizuho sees about 50% upside for D-Wave stock after the company laid out its road map to 2032.<\/p>\n<p>Cheng Xin &amp;sol; Getty Images<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>What D-Wave Quantum actually does<\/h2>\n<p>D-Wave is the only company selling two kinds of quantum computers.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Its older annealing systems<\/strong> are tuned for optimization problems, like finding the cheapest delivery route across thousands of stops. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Its newer gate-model systems<\/strong>, added through the Quantum Circuits acquisition, reported by Business Wire, aim at the broad, general-purpose market that rivals chase.<\/p>\n<p>At its first investor day, management stretched its road map to 2032 and stuck to a goal of 10 \u201clogical\u201d qubits by 2030 and 100 by 2032. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Logical qubits <\/strong>bundle many error-prone physical qubits into one stable, reliable unit, which is <strong>what real-world workloads will need<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h2>The revenue drop that looks worse than it sounds<\/h2>\n<p>The headline number from D-Wave\u2019s first quarter did not look good. <strong>Revenue fell 81% <\/strong>from a year earlier to $2.9 million, the company said in its first-quarter results.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s <strong>what happened<\/strong>: <\/p>\n<p>The prior-year quarter booked a one-time $12.6 million sale of a full annealing system, a sale that\u2019s hard to repeat every three months, and did not repeat this quarter. <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Related: IBM CEO sends strong message on quantum computing<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Hence, the drop in revenue reflects the missing sale, but is not an indication of a shrinking business.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>forward-looking numbers did better<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>Bookings jumped almost 2,000% to a record $33.4 million, backlog climbed 563%, and D-Wave ended the period with $588 million in cash, according to its earnings release.<\/p>\n<h2>How QBTS stock stacks up against the quantum pack<\/h2>\n<p>D-Wave moves with a group of other quantum stocks, so it helps to see where QBTS sits.<\/p>\n<p><strong>QBTS versus its peers in 2026:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>D-Wave entered this week down about 11% year to date and roughly 50% below its 52-week high of $46.75.<\/li>\n<li>IonQ has been the standout, the only major pure-play holding a positive 2026 return, 24\/7 Wall St. noted.<\/li>\n<li>Rigetti has tracked D-Wave closely as a fellow laggard, while newly public Quantinuum has raised the bar on valuation, The Motley Fool reported.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The takeaway for readers is that a target hike on one name often lifts the others, which cuts both ways when sentiment turns.<\/p>\n<h2>What still has to go right for D-Wave to reach $35<\/h2>\n<p>Mizuho\u2019s 50% target is a forecast, not a promise, and several things have to line up first before that target becomes a reality.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What bulls need to see next:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Bookings turning into recognized revenue<\/strong>, the gap D-Wave still has to close.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Delivery of its planned 17-qubit system<\/strong> this year, an early proof point flagged by The Motley Fool.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Steady progress<\/strong> toward the 2030 and 2032 qubit goals.<\/li>\n<li><strong>A clean read at the next earnings report<\/strong>, due August 6, 2026.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The risks are also real.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Valuation<\/strong>: worth more than $9 billion against just $2.9 million in quarterly revenue, so the price already assumes years of growth it hasn\u2019t delivered. <\/li>\n<li><strong>Bigger competitors<\/strong>: IBM and the newly public Quantinuum are better-funded and chasing the same customers. <\/li>\n<li><strong>Wild price swings<\/strong>: routine 10% to 15% single-day moves on no company news. <\/li>\n<li><strong>Policy dependence<\/strong>: the $100 million federal equity stake, reported by CNBC, props up the balance sheet but ties the stock to government decisions D-Wave doesn\u2019t control.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>The bottom line for QBTS investors<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The bull case<\/strong> rests on a record order book, a deep cash pile, and a top-ranked analyst who believes the market is underpricing D-Wave\u2019s roadmap. <\/p>\n<p>Wall Street\u2019s average rating is still a \u201cStrong Buy,\u201d according to StockAnalysis.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The bear case<\/strong> is that the company earns very little today and trades on hopes for the 2030s.<\/p>\n<p>Mizuho\u2019s call does not give assurances, but it does raise the stakes into the next earnings report.<\/p>\n<p>The practical move is to watch whether bookings start converting into sales.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Related: Mizuho just rerated these 3 AI winners<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>#Mizuho #sees #QBTS #stock #market #missing<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2026 has not been the best year for shares in quantum computing darling D-Wave Quantum\u2019s (QBTS). The company kept posting engineering wins and a fast-growing order book, yet the stock&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7765,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[246],"tags":[33,4204,5560,10007,1006,91],"class_list":["post-7764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-popular","tag-market","tag-missing","tag-mizuho","tag-qbts","tag-sees","tag-stock"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7764"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7764\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7765"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}