{"id":6035,"date":"2026-06-07T01:11:17","date_gmt":"2026-06-07T01:11:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/?p=6035"},"modified":"2026-06-07T01:11:17","modified_gmt":"2026-06-07T01:11:17","slug":"japan-philippines-test-xi-on-taiwan-as-trump-treads-softly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fintechpulse8.com\/?p=6035","title":{"rendered":"Japan, Philippines test Xi on Taiwan as Trump treads softly"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

As the Trump administration tones down its public stance on Taiwan, key US allies Japan and the Philippines are becoming more vocal in challenging Chinese President Xi Jinping on his most sensitive issue.<\/p>\n

The leaders of Japan and the Philippines have suggested in recent months their nations would likely be drawn into any fight over Taiwan, remarks that irked Beijing. The two have also moved to deepen military ties, agreeing last week to elevate their relationship and open a series of defense talks.<\/p>\n

That fast-deepening alignment contrasts with Washington\u2019s emphasis on a more \u2018quiet\u2019 approach toward Taiwan. At a Beijing summit last month, President Donald Trump backed Xi\u2019s vision of \u201cstrategic stability\u201d in bilateral ties and echoed some of his talking points on the self-ruled democracy.<\/p>\n

Then, at a security forum in Singapore last weekend, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth became the first Pentagon chief in over a decade to avoid mentioning Taiwan in his speech.<\/p>\n

Read:
Taiwan overtakes India as world\u2019s fifth-largest stock market
Winners and losers from Trump and Xi\u2019s two-day Beijing summit<\/p>\n

Japan and the Philippines have \u201chit fast-forward on building a wider network of partners\u201d, said Raymond Powell, a retired US Air Force colonel who founded the SeaLight Foundation, a maritime transparency initiative.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf Beijing is going to weaponize markets and maritime spaces, its neighbours have to respond by weaving a denser, more resilient network to complicate its strategic calculus.\u201d<\/p>\n

Although Hegseth said US policy toward Taiwan was unchanged and that the only shift was in tone, it remains unclear if Trump will proceed with a stalled $14 billion arms package for Taiwan. Trump has called the weapons deal a \u201cbargaining chip\u201d, breaking with precedent.<\/p>\n

On Wednesday, Secretary of State Macro Rubio said the sale is not being withheld but \u201cjust under review\u201d during a hearing of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.<\/p>\n

\n

SECRETARY RUBIO: “5 months ago, we did the single largest sale to Taiwan in history at $11 billion.” pic.twitter.com\/r3LFksEbIx<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

ADVERTISEMENT<\/p>\n

CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\u2014 Department of State (@StateDept) June 3, 2026<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

As the fate of that deal remains unresolved, leaders in Tokyo and Manila are testing how far the two nations can go in cooperating on defense matters without provoking an overwhelming response from Beijing.<\/p>\n

Last week\u2019s agreement opened talks on a military information-sharing pact and on resolving their maritime borders, building on earlier deals to ease joint exercises and share supplies.<\/p>\n

Those moves followed remarks last month by Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. that his nation would likely be drawn into any Taiwan conflict given its proximity to the island, echoing similar comments in November by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

China has responded with indignation in both cases. Beijing claims the self-ruled island as its territory, a stance Taipei rejects.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n

CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

China\u2019s response to Tokyo has been particularly harsh. After Takaichi suggested last year that a Taiwan Strait crisis could amount to a \u201csurvival-threatening situation\u201d, Beijing rolled out punitive economic and political measures and froze official exchanges, demanding that she retracts the comments.<\/p>\n

The Japan-Philippine border talks especially angered China, since negotiations would cover waters east of Taiwan where Beijing also claims economic and continental-shelf rights.<\/p>\n

On Monday, China sent Coast Guard vessels to patrol Taiwan\u2019s east in a show of de-facto \u201cjurisdiction\u201d, warning of \u201cunprecedented\u201d countermeasures if the talks proceed.<\/p>\n

State broadcaster CCTV accused the two nations of \u201ccolluding\u201d to pursue their own ends. In Beijing\u2019s telling, Japan is leveraging the Philippines to contain China, while Manila is angling for greater security commitments, military aid and more bargaining chips in the contested South China Sea.<\/p>\n

Japan and the Philippines have cast the talks differently. Marcos said the steps were meant to uphold a rules-based maritime order and build trust, while Takaichi framed deeper ties as the work of like-minded nations to meet unspecified challenges in the changing global environment.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Sanae Takaichi and Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in Tokyo on 28 May. Image: Kiyoshi Ota\/Bloomberg<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

China has also bristled at Japan\u2019s deepening ties with NATO. A Foreign Ministry spokesperson on Monday decried Japan\u2019s plan to send four Self-Defense Forces personnel to a NATO training headquarters in Germany \u2013 the first time it has done so \u2013 as proof the nation was pursuing \u201cremilitarisation at full throttle\u201d.<\/p>\n

Japan and the Philippines have already signed deals to streamline logistics and ease joint exercises, plus a separate accord to make military supplies more interoperable. Japan now holds information-sharing agreements with the US, South Korea, India and NATO, among others.<\/p>\n

These efforts also underscore how US allies are navigating Trump\u2019s \u2018America First\u2019 approach, which increasingly leaves them to fend for themselves.<\/p>\n

Read: NATO bids gain support, China in focus at summit<\/p>\n

\n
\n

ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n

CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Yoichiro Sato, a professor of international relations at Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, said Japan is \u201csandwiched\u201d between China\u2019s accusations and US demands for greater defense spending, pressures Trump has applied to allies in both Europe and Asia.<\/p>\n

\u201cAs long as the US holds a credible \u2018stick\u2019, Japan does not have to hear loud anti-China talk from the US. The problem is the decline in the relative US power to project forces in East Asia,\u201d he said. \u201cFilling the void left by the insufficient US commitment is the primary reason.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

US, Japanese and Philippine troops pose for pictures during the annual Balikatan joint military drills on 4 May.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The sentiment runs deep in Manila too. Rommel Ong, a retired rear admiral in the Philippine Navy, said the goal for Filipinos is \u201cTrump-proofing our defense posture against shocks from US policies, diminished presence in East Asia and global commitments\u201d.<\/p>\n

The border talks, Ong added, would \u201cprovide a structured template for joint patrols between the two states\u201d, affecting China\u2019s intent to control the strategic Bashi Channel between Taiwan and the Philippines.<\/p>\n

Should such activities become routine, the odds of accidental flare-ups are likely to rise. Analysts warn that more Chinese pressure, absent any restraint from Beijing or firmer commitment from Washington, risks deepening a classic security dilemma in which each side\u2019s defensive moves provoke the other.<\/p>\n

For now, Beijing appears wary of overreacting.<\/p>\n

\u201cJapan\u2019s efforts to build closer security and military ties with regional countries and NATO have been ongoing for a few years,\u201d said Zhu Feng of Nanjing University\u2019s School of International Studies, calling it a natural result of a shifting balance of power. Closer cooperation between Japan and the Philippines, he warned, \u201cwill be a test for China\u2019s strategic patience\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u00a9 2026 Bloomberg<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n