![](\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/img-assets\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/GettyImages-2273920902-e1782918262951.jpg?w=2048\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Emily Blunt just took home a cool $15 million for her role on Disclosure Day\u2014<\/em>hot off the back of a $12.5 million payday for reprising her role as Emily Charlton on The<\/em> Devil Wears Prada 2.<\/em> <\/em>But she could have been earning a much more modest income had she pursued her original dream career.\u00a0<\/p>\n That\u2019s because growing up, Blunt didn\u2019t want to be an actress at all. She had her sights set on a far less glamorous job: Translating.<\/p>\n \u201cBefore I was going to be an actress, I wanted to work for the UN and be a Spanish translator,\u201d she recently told BBC Radio 2.<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019ve always loved languages,\u201d Blunt added. \u201cMy mother is an incredible linguist, so I think I grew up being quite inspired by her.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n As well as inventing an entire alien language made up of creepy clicking noises and hums for her most recent role in Steven Spielberg\u2019s sci-fi thriller Disclosure Day, <\/em>she also had to learn Russian and Korean. And before that, Blunt learned how to talk about river beds and fishing in Mandarin for the 2011 rom-com Salmon Fishing in the Yemen.<\/em><\/p>\n And while we have gotten a taste of her flair for languages on the big screen, Spielberg, who was also in the interview, said out loud what everyone was thinking: \u201cI\u2019m glad you didn\u2019t take that job.\u201d And even Blunt agreed, \u201cMe too.\u201d<\/p>\n As the BBC<\/em> put it, in the caption of the interview: \u201cWe\u2019re so glad we\u2019re in the universe where Emily became an actress and not a Spanish translator for the UN.\u201d<\/p>\n Had she become a translator, Blunt would have been on a much smaller $80,000+ salary, her job would be at risk of being replaced by AI, and the world would never have seen her Oscar-winning performance in Oppenheimer<\/em>.<\/p>\n In fact, research from Microsoft showed that interpreters and translators have a 98% overlap with AI\u2014meaning the likes of ChatGPT and Copilot can already do the majority of the role\u2019s tasks, placing it at the top of their list of 40 jobs most exposed by AI.<\/p>\n Monthly rates for freelancers start at around $6,727, but they vary slightly depending on where you live and whether you need Social Security added.\u00a0<\/p>\n An expired job ad for an experienced English interpreter at the UN advertised a salary range between $131,084 and $171,644. <\/p>\n But there\u2019s a catch: Blunt wouldn\u2019t have been able to apply anyway. <\/p>\n The role needed fluency in at least three languages\u2014and Blunt, by her own admission, just about speaks Spanish.<\/p>\n \u201cI was studying Spanish as one of my A levels, and then I was going to go and do a year in South America, and then by that point I was going to be fluent, and I was going to be the best translator ever,\u201d she previously told Howard Stern.\u00a0<\/p>\n Acting, she admitted, had barely crossed her mind. She had only started doing school plays to help manage her debilitating stutter. And it was because the head of drama at her school recruited her for his \u201cbizarre\u201d rock opera at the Edinburgh Theater Festival that her life accidentally changed course in the summer of 2000.<\/p>\n His agent was in the audience\u2014and walked out with a new client: Blunt.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cHe took me on and said, \u2018Do you want to do this? Is this something you want to do?\u2019 And I said, \u2018Oh, I hadn\u2019t really thought about it as a career,\u2019\u201d Blunt recalled.\u00a0<\/p>\n Still, she took him up on the offer, started auditioning after finishing school the following year, and the rest is history. Today, Blunt has racked up over 45 movies to her name and an estimated $80 million net worth to show for it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\nInstead of an $80 million net worth, Blunt could have been earning $80,000 as a translator<\/h2>\n